出处票 / Source ticket
c34971c8cf
陶寺遗址的一处水井中也曾发现口簧（J401：29），原报告称为"骨发卡"《石峁遗址出土口簧的年代问题——兼谈石峁遗址的分期》 PDF 第 3 页 · 第 19–20 行 / lines 19–20
两家读过 · 一致 / Read by two readers · agreed
料的提交 / Source commit: b190ae1c
取票时刻 / Taken at:
用了它的句子 / Sentences using it
另一篇文章举出陶寺：那里的一口水井里也出过一件口簧，原报告叫它「骨发卡」。 簧 · 石峁 · Reed · Shimao →
陶寺那件的年代，两篇文章凭的东西不一样：前一篇说，和它同出的陶器是陶寺晚期的典型器物，绝对年代约为公元前 1900 年；后一篇引的是同一口井里出土的木炭，测得公元前 2140～1946 年，并说这和石峁那批兽骨的数据基本一致。 簧 · 石峁 · Reed · Shimao →
发掘简报说是；陶寺也出过一件，两篇文章给它的年代不同：一篇凭同出的陶器，一篇凭同一口井里的木炭。 簧 · 石峁 · Reed · Shimao →
The second article points to Taosi 陶寺, where a jaw harp was also found, in a well; the original report had called it a bone hairpin. 簧 · 石峁 · Reed · Shimao →
For the Taosi piece the two articles rest on different things. The first says the pottery found with it is typical of late Taosi, with an absolute date of about 1900 BCE; the second cites charcoal from the same well, dated to 2140–1946 BCE, and says this essentially matches the dates from the Shimao animal bone. 簧 · 石峁 · Reed · Shimao →
The excavation report says so; Taosi has one too, and the two articles date it differently, one by the pottery found with it, the other by charcoal from the same well. 簧 · 石峁 · Reed · Shimao →
发掘简报说是；陶寺也出过一件，两篇文章给它的年代不同：一篇凭同出的陶器，一篇凭同一口井里的木炭。 阙疑录 · 石峁 · Gaps · Shimao →
The excavation report says so; Taosi has one too, and the two articles date it differently, one by the pottery found with it, the other by charcoal from the same well. 阙疑录 · 石峁 · Gaps · Shimao →